Our advertising partners may set these cookies on our site. These cookies enable these companies to create a profile of your interests and display relevant advertisements on other websites. They do not store personal information directly but rely on unique identifiers for your browser and internet device. Opting out of these cookies may result in less personalized advertising for you.
Data Quality Score Measurements
Comprehensive evaluation framework ensuring research data integrity through systematic assessment of sample bias, fraud detection, and data consistency measures.
Self-selection bias
People with specific characteristics are more likely to participate than others.
Non-response bias
People who refuse to participate or drop out systematically differ from those who take part.
Undercoverage bias
Some members of a population are inadequately represented in the sample.
Survivorship bias
Successful observations or people are more likely to be represented in the sample than unsuccessful ones.
Pre-screening or advertising bias
Bias due to the way participants are pre-screened or where a study is advertised.
Healthy user bias
Volunteers for preventative interventions are more likely to pursue health-boosting behaviors than others.
π IP Address Tracking
Monitoring IP addresses helps identify multiple survey submissions from the same source. However, sophisticated fraudsters may use proxy servers or VPNs to conceal their true IP addresses.
π Consistency Checks
Analyzing survey response patterns for inconsistencies or illogical answers can reveal potential fraud. For example, if a respondent provides contradictory answers to related survey questions, it can indicate dishonest participation.
β±οΈ Time Analysis
Evaluating the time taken to complete a survey can uncover suspicious behavior. Extremely short completion times may suggest the respondent didnβt read the survey questions, while excessively long times could point to a bot attempting to evade detection.
β Cross-Verification
Including similar questions in different formats within the survey helps verify the consistency and authenticity of responses. Inconsistent answers to comparable survey items can serve as red flags for fraud.
π Digital Fingerprinting
Leveraging digital fingerprinting technology enables identification of devices that submit multiple survey responses. This method is often more effective than IP tracking alone in preventing survey fraud.
β±οΈ Speeders
Respondents who complete surveys too quickly, indicating potentially low-quality responses.
β‘ Straight-liners
Respondents who select the same answer for every question, indicating potentially low-quality responses.
π Outliers
Responses far outside the norm. Visualizations like box plots or scatter plots can highlight abnormal data points for review.
π Duplicate responses
Multiple identical survey forms representing duplicate data that should be identified and removed to prevent skewing analysis.
π Mono answer
Responses that lack variation or show a repetitive pattern, indicating limited engagement or automated submission.
ποΈ Junk responses
Nonsensical, irrelevant, or meaningless answers that provide no valuable data and should be filtered out.
We believe in partnering with our clients
We are keen to connect with you and discover the next big insight for you
Contact us





